FRUIT PIECE Hand Colored Currier And Ives Lithograph C2179
Item History & Price
TITLE: FRUIT PIECE
Publisher:Currier & Ives152 Nassau St. New York Date: 1870 Folio Size: Small folio Artist: Unlisted Conningham #2179 Gale # Scene Description: Horizontal depiction of multiple pieces of fruit: peaches, pears, grapes, apples on a table surface Condition:age toned, damp stained, nice colors see photos Shipping: I would be happy to combine items to reduce shipping costs.I utilize a 20.5” by 17” flat ULI...NE cardboard mailer for the unframed prints that is quite stiff to prevent bending in transit. I put extra support inside the mailer again to prevent bending. Each of the prints is placed in a sleeve with archival paper. Shipment will be by Priority Mail. Most of these packages weigh around 2 pounds.Famed lithographs will ship securely wrapped in a box of appropriate size and of course the shipping for these will be more expensive. Shipment will be by Priority Mail. Lithographs to be listed for sale:Having been a collector of all types of lithographs for over 50 years it’s time for me to thin down my collection of many, many hundreds of prints by Nathaniel Currier, Currier & Ives, Kellogg, Kellogg & Comstock, Sarony, Major, Knapp, Haskell & Allen, Thomas Kelly, James Baillie, and many others. For the first few weeks I will be listing the minor lithographs in my collection, some of the more important collectible ones will follow in a month or two. I often have multiple examples of the lithographs and have many variants that have not been catalogued in any of the major reference books. I guarantee that all of the antique prints I am selling here are originals and not later copies. If you ever find that I have made an error, I will happily refund your entire cost including shipping. Photographs:The unframed lithographs are photographed on a bright white sheet of archival paper, measuring 14” by 18”. Rulers have been placed on 2 sides of the archival paper so that you can evaluate the actual size of the print. History of Currier & Ives:Nathaniel Currier was apprenticed in 1828 (age 15) to the Boston printing shop of William & John Pendleton. He was taught lithography there by the chief printer a man named Dubois. In 1833, he left the Pendleton’s’ operation to move to Philadelphia to work with M E D Brown. In 1834, he left to move to NYC to rejoin John Pendleton, where he formed a partnership with Stodart and bought out Pendleton. The firm was named Currier & Stodart. This firm performed commercial orders including sheet music. By 1835, they had dissolved their partnership and Currier started his own business “N. Currier, Lithographer” at 1 Wall Street. Currier started trying out new prints of newsworthy events such as the death of President Harrison in 1841, and disaster such as “The Ruins of the Planter’s Hotel, New Orleans” (this is believed to be his first disaster print). Currier made his name with the disaster print “Awful Conflagration of the Steamboat Lexington” which as published in the “New York Sun”. I have several of these and they are quite impressive. By 1852 the business was expanding and Currier hired James Ives as the office manager. Ives was a self-taught artist and brother-in-law of Nathaniel’s brother Charles. In 1857, Ives was made a partner and from there on all imprints were “Currier & Ives”. In 1880, Nathaniel retired and turned the business over to his son, Edward. Nathaniel died in 1888. James Ives remained with the firm until his death in 1895. James Ives’ son Chauncey took over as the partner. In 1902, Currier sold out to Ives, who sold the firm in 1907 and it folded shortly thereafter, reportedly the lithograph stones were sold as fill for construction projects. A sad end to an amazing firm. Addresses and approximate dates: useful for dating undated printsStodart & Currier 137 Broadway NY 1834-35N. Currier 1 Wall Street NY 1835-36N. Currier 148 Nassau St NY 1836-37N. Currier 152 Nassau St Cor. Spruce 1838-56N. Currier 2 Spruce St NY 1838-56C&I 152 Nassau St NY 1857-72C&I 125 Nassau St NY 1872-74C&I 123 Nassau St NY 1874-77C&I 115 Nassau St NY 1877-94C&I 108 Fulton St NY 1894-96C&I 33 Spruce St NY 1896-07 Of note Currier utilized 2 floors of 33 Spruce Street from at least 1866 onward but rarely used that address on the prints. I have found prints dating far before 1866 with that address, so I suspect it was used many years earlier by the colorists working for Currier. Competitors to Currier & Ives:There were multiple lithographers competing with Currier & Ives although none were ever as successful as Currier & Ives. Generally, the competitors had artwork that was somewhat more primitive and the paper stock was usually of a lesser grade. Some of the competitors worked for Currier (or Currier worked with them) at one time or another. The major competitors: D.W. KelloggDaniel Wright Kellogg & Co. (b. 1807) established in 1830 (pre-dating Currier) the firm retained his name until 1842, although after 1836 the work was done by his brothers and other employees. In 1842 the firm was formally taken over by his younger brothers E.B. & E. C. Kellogg. The firm was in Hartford, CT. I find that the DW Kellogg lithographs are generally of much higher quality and printed on better paper than any of the other lithographers. These are all from the 1830’s.E. B. & E. C. KelloggEdmund Burke & Elijah Chapman Kellogg younger brothers of DW Kellogg. Established in 1842 they operated under this name until 1848 it them became Kellogg & Comstock through 1850. The brothers resumed their partnership in 1855 and continued until the firm became Kellogg & Bulkeley in 1867.Kellogg(s) & ComstockIn 1848 the Kellogg’s were joined by John C. Comstock but the association was dissolved in 1850.Kellogg & BulkeleyThis was the succeeding firm after the EB & EC Kellogg years and was formed in 1867Haskell & AllenFamous lithography firm out of Boston with some truly remarkable prints, equally collectible as compared to Currier.Sarony, Major & KnappStarted by the famous photographer and artist Napoleon Sarony. This firm produced lithographs for the famous Pacific Rail Road Survey of the mid-1850’sJames BaillieWorked as a colorist for Currier for a number of years before starting his own lithography firm. Many of his prints appear to be “knockoffs” of Currier works.James BuffordBufford was a solid competitor of Currier & Ives and has some very lovely prints, but they are not often seen. Some of the large folios of ships are quite striking in my view.Thomas Kelly Not too much is known about Kelly but he worked at least in the 1850’s in NYC. His works are often more primitive than the others but he does have a few fine pieces. I have owned many Kelly’s over the years and will list a few here. His paper was often inferior quality compared to the other lithographers. Reference Materials:George Cohenour Currier & Ives Lithographs Value Guide it’s out of print and not always easy to find, and the prices are out of date (2001) but the list is more complete than ConninghamGale Research Currier & Ives A Catalogue Raisonne (extremely difficult to find this 2 volume set runs $350+ when you can, but in my view the best reference books); Frederic Conningham Currier & Ives An Illustrated Check List (this one and Gale are the core of any set of C&I books); Harry Peters America On Stone; Harry Peters Currier & Ives, Printmakers to the American People; American Historical Print Collector’s Society publication: Imprint; and Jane Cooper Bland Currier & Ives A Manual for Collectors. For those really interested in old lithographs, consider joining the American Historical Print Collectors Society (can be found on the web). The AHPCS is a good resource and an excellent way to meet fellow collectors. Folio Sizes: (Note this does not refer to the size of the paper on which the litho was printed but rather the image size)Very Small: up to about 7” by 9”Small: approximately 8.8” by 12.8”Medium: approximately 9” by 14” to 14” by 20”Large: anything over 14” by 20” Note that Gale and Conningham occasionally have differences of opinion on what is a small, medium or even a large folio lithograph. Sorting out small versus medium on the vignettes is virtually impossible and I consider many of the determinations by both Gale and Conningham to be arbitrary. Original Sheet Sizes: (Note most prints have been cut down over the years to fit into whatever frame was used so full sheets are quite rare) 131/2 by 173/414 by 1816 by 2019 by 2420 by 2622 by 2824 by 3025 by 3326 by 3628 by 4030 by 41 (only one title of this size printed) Artists:Over the years the firm employed many artists and/or many artists used Currier as an outlet for their freelance work. I have listed some of the more famous ones below. I have examples of all in my collection. Recall also that Nathaniel Currier and James Ives were artists in their own right. Outside artists might be employed to do a painting or drawing and might or might not be employed to then re-create this image on stone (as the lithographer).Thomas WorthLouis MaurerJames IvesFrancis “Fanny” PalmerJohn CameronCharles ParsonsE. B. King (Darktown Series)Murphy (Darktown Series)Arthur Fitzwilliam TaitCharles ButterworthC. M. VergnesScott LeightonNapoleon SaronyV. OstenbachJ. McGeeKembleSamuel JonesGeorge CatlinSamuel Johnson Paper Stock:Originally Currier and subsequently Currier & Ives used a quality of paper that was better than many of their peers, with what appears to be a higher rag (cotton fiber) content. As the years progressed I have seen many originals printed on paper of much lesser quality, including some with modest pulp content in the 1880-90’s. After making that comment, I will say that very high pulp content papers are not typical of any original Currier & Ives and would make the print immediately suspect in terms of authenticity. As several people have mentioned to me, during the Civil War Currier & Ives frequently used a grade of paper of much lower quality (as cotton linters were scarce) and that is why it is so difficult to obtain Civil War lithographs in decent condition. Printing Process:In general Currier & Ives lithographs were produced by the process of single stone lithography, but some of the more complex lithographs required 3 or more stones, generally each one for a different color. There are also a number of chromolithographs produced by the firm in the 1890’s that are often listed as “printed in oils” which were done with stones but by an outside firm as C&I was not set up to handle this more modern process. Generally, once you have seen a real C&I you will not be fooled by the run of the mill later copies. Conservation and Restoration: I am not a purist, some do not believe in restoring old lithographs, rather they believe we should leave well enough alone. I do not accept that philosophy for lithographs that have significant damage, have been improperly stored or will be destroyed over time by acidic or other conditions. So, I believe in restoration and conservation, but only to the extent necessary…………There are many lithographs that deserve full restoration and conservation services (something I am doing). The process of restoration and conservation is time consuming and costly and not all lithographs are worth the time or expense. You can infer from this description that the rarest lithographs undergoing conservation will not appear here. If you have an interest in the process I would suggest you look into the publications of the AIC (American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works). Conservators rarely discuss their techniques and discourage amateurs from trying to restore old prints. However, restoration and conservation represent chemistry and physics with a goodly dose of artistic interpretation, and a hefty dose of the proper equipment and training and so there only a few conservators to use. I use Wayne Osterholm as my conservator. Taking care of these lithographs will assure that the next generation has a chance to evaluate the history of our country through the contemporary eyes of these famous artists. I think we owe preservation of these historic documents to our children and our grandchildren. Frames: Occasionally I will sell a lithograph framed, but generally my lithographs are unframed, these are placed in a plastic sleeve for protection Upcoming Items:For the next year or two I plan to list 10+ lithographs per week so I can thin down the mass of prints stored in cabinets. Questions:I will try to answer any and all questions posed to me. Bidding:Generally, I start the lithographs off at a low price, however, there will be a select few that are not in the low-price category. Many of you do not bid until the last 10 seconds or so of an auction, so I do not end my auctions early unless there is an error in the listing that is discovered too late for people to evaluate a correction. If you notice an error just let me know and I will fix it promptly or remove the litho. Again, I want you to be satisfied with your purchase AND have enough information up front to decide if you should even bid on the lithograph. I previously sold lithographs for about 8 years on eBay in the early 2000’s with a different seller ID. Returns:You may return this lithograph if you are dissatisfied with the accuracy of my description, or if I failed to disclose pertinent information in either: the description, details, pictures or answers to queries. Returnable that is, provided it is returned in the same condition as you received it. Shipping charges are not refundable. Thanks for looking and good luck, I hope you are successful in your collecting!
Publisher:Currier & Ives152 Nassau St. New York Date: 1870 Folio Size: Small folio Artist: Unlisted Conningham #2179 Gale # Scene Description: Horizontal depiction of multiple pieces of fruit: peaches, pears, grapes, apples on a table surface Condition:age toned, damp stained, nice colors see photos Shipping: I would be happy to combine items to reduce shipping costs.I utilize a 20.5” by 17” flat ULI...NE cardboard mailer for the unframed prints that is quite stiff to prevent bending in transit. I put extra support inside the mailer again to prevent bending. Each of the prints is placed in a sleeve with archival paper. Shipment will be by Priority Mail. Most of these packages weigh around 2 pounds.Famed lithographs will ship securely wrapped in a box of appropriate size and of course the shipping for these will be more expensive. Shipment will be by Priority Mail. Lithographs to be listed for sale:Having been a collector of all types of lithographs for over 50 years it’s time for me to thin down my collection of many, many hundreds of prints by Nathaniel Currier, Currier & Ives, Kellogg, Kellogg & Comstock, Sarony, Major, Knapp, Haskell & Allen, Thomas Kelly, James Baillie, and many others. For the first few weeks I will be listing the minor lithographs in my collection, some of the more important collectible ones will follow in a month or two. I often have multiple examples of the lithographs and have many variants that have not been catalogued in any of the major reference books. I guarantee that all of the antique prints I am selling here are originals and not later copies. If you ever find that I have made an error, I will happily refund your entire cost including shipping. Photographs:The unframed lithographs are photographed on a bright white sheet of archival paper, measuring 14” by 18”. Rulers have been placed on 2 sides of the archival paper so that you can evaluate the actual size of the print. History of Currier & Ives:Nathaniel Currier was apprenticed in 1828 (age 15) to the Boston printing shop of William & John Pendleton. He was taught lithography there by the chief printer a man named Dubois. In 1833, he left the Pendleton’s’ operation to move to Philadelphia to work with M E D Brown. In 1834, he left to move to NYC to rejoin John Pendleton, where he formed a partnership with Stodart and bought out Pendleton. The firm was named Currier & Stodart. This firm performed commercial orders including sheet music. By 1835, they had dissolved their partnership and Currier started his own business “N. Currier, Lithographer” at 1 Wall Street. Currier started trying out new prints of newsworthy events such as the death of President Harrison in 1841, and disaster such as “The Ruins of the Planter’s Hotel, New Orleans” (this is believed to be his first disaster print). Currier made his name with the disaster print “Awful Conflagration of the Steamboat Lexington” which as published in the “New York Sun”. I have several of these and they are quite impressive. By 1852 the business was expanding and Currier hired James Ives as the office manager. Ives was a self-taught artist and brother-in-law of Nathaniel’s brother Charles. In 1857, Ives was made a partner and from there on all imprints were “Currier & Ives”. In 1880, Nathaniel retired and turned the business over to his son, Edward. Nathaniel died in 1888. James Ives remained with the firm until his death in 1895. James Ives’ son Chauncey took over as the partner. In 1902, Currier sold out to Ives, who sold the firm in 1907 and it folded shortly thereafter, reportedly the lithograph stones were sold as fill for construction projects. A sad end to an amazing firm. Addresses and approximate dates: useful for dating undated printsStodart & Currier 137 Broadway NY 1834-35N. Currier 1 Wall Street NY 1835-36N. Currier 148 Nassau St NY 1836-37N. Currier 152 Nassau St Cor. Spruce 1838-56N. Currier 2 Spruce St NY 1838-56C&I 152 Nassau St NY 1857-72C&I 125 Nassau St NY 1872-74C&I 123 Nassau St NY 1874-77C&I 115 Nassau St NY 1877-94C&I 108 Fulton St NY 1894-96C&I 33 Spruce St NY 1896-07 Of note Currier utilized 2 floors of 33 Spruce Street from at least 1866 onward but rarely used that address on the prints. I have found prints dating far before 1866 with that address, so I suspect it was used many years earlier by the colorists working for Currier. Competitors to Currier & Ives:There were multiple lithographers competing with Currier & Ives although none were ever as successful as Currier & Ives. Generally, the competitors had artwork that was somewhat more primitive and the paper stock was usually of a lesser grade. Some of the competitors worked for Currier (or Currier worked with them) at one time or another. The major competitors: D.W. KelloggDaniel Wright Kellogg & Co. (b. 1807) established in 1830 (pre-dating Currier) the firm retained his name until 1842, although after 1836 the work was done by his brothers and other employees. In 1842 the firm was formally taken over by his younger brothers E.B. & E. C. Kellogg. The firm was in Hartford, CT. I find that the DW Kellogg lithographs are generally of much higher quality and printed on better paper than any of the other lithographers. These are all from the 1830’s.E. B. & E. C. KelloggEdmund Burke & Elijah Chapman Kellogg younger brothers of DW Kellogg. Established in 1842 they operated under this name until 1848 it them became Kellogg & Comstock through 1850. The brothers resumed their partnership in 1855 and continued until the firm became Kellogg & Bulkeley in 1867.Kellogg(s) & ComstockIn 1848 the Kellogg’s were joined by John C. Comstock but the association was dissolved in 1850.Kellogg & BulkeleyThis was the succeeding firm after the EB & EC Kellogg years and was formed in 1867Haskell & AllenFamous lithography firm out of Boston with some truly remarkable prints, equally collectible as compared to Currier.Sarony, Major & KnappStarted by the famous photographer and artist Napoleon Sarony. This firm produced lithographs for the famous Pacific Rail Road Survey of the mid-1850’sJames BaillieWorked as a colorist for Currier for a number of years before starting his own lithography firm. Many of his prints appear to be “knockoffs” of Currier works.James BuffordBufford was a solid competitor of Currier & Ives and has some very lovely prints, but they are not often seen. Some of the large folios of ships are quite striking in my view.Thomas Kelly Not too much is known about Kelly but he worked at least in the 1850’s in NYC. His works are often more primitive than the others but he does have a few fine pieces. I have owned many Kelly’s over the years and will list a few here. His paper was often inferior quality compared to the other lithographers. Reference Materials:George Cohenour Currier & Ives Lithographs Value Guide it’s out of print and not always easy to find, and the prices are out of date (2001) but the list is more complete than ConninghamGale Research Currier & Ives A Catalogue Raisonne (extremely difficult to find this 2 volume set runs $350+ when you can, but in my view the best reference books); Frederic Conningham Currier & Ives An Illustrated Check List (this one and Gale are the core of any set of C&I books); Harry Peters America On Stone; Harry Peters Currier & Ives, Printmakers to the American People; American Historical Print Collector’s Society publication: Imprint; and Jane Cooper Bland Currier & Ives A Manual for Collectors. For those really interested in old lithographs, consider joining the American Historical Print Collectors Society (can be found on the web). The AHPCS is a good resource and an excellent way to meet fellow collectors. Folio Sizes: (Note this does not refer to the size of the paper on which the litho was printed but rather the image size)Very Small: up to about 7” by 9”Small: approximately 8.8” by 12.8”Medium: approximately 9” by 14” to 14” by 20”Large: anything over 14” by 20” Note that Gale and Conningham occasionally have differences of opinion on what is a small, medium or even a large folio lithograph. Sorting out small versus medium on the vignettes is virtually impossible and I consider many of the determinations by both Gale and Conningham to be arbitrary. Original Sheet Sizes: (Note most prints have been cut down over the years to fit into whatever frame was used so full sheets are quite rare) 131/2 by 173/414 by 1816 by 2019 by 2420 by 2622 by 2824 by 3025 by 3326 by 3628 by 4030 by 41 (only one title of this size printed) Artists:Over the years the firm employed many artists and/or many artists used Currier as an outlet for their freelance work. I have listed some of the more famous ones below. I have examples of all in my collection. Recall also that Nathaniel Currier and James Ives were artists in their own right. Outside artists might be employed to do a painting or drawing and might or might not be employed to then re-create this image on stone (as the lithographer).Thomas WorthLouis MaurerJames IvesFrancis “Fanny” PalmerJohn CameronCharles ParsonsE. B. King (Darktown Series)Murphy (Darktown Series)Arthur Fitzwilliam TaitCharles ButterworthC. M. VergnesScott LeightonNapoleon SaronyV. OstenbachJ. McGeeKembleSamuel JonesGeorge CatlinSamuel Johnson Paper Stock:Originally Currier and subsequently Currier & Ives used a quality of paper that was better than many of their peers, with what appears to be a higher rag (cotton fiber) content. As the years progressed I have seen many originals printed on paper of much lesser quality, including some with modest pulp content in the 1880-90’s. After making that comment, I will say that very high pulp content papers are not typical of any original Currier & Ives and would make the print immediately suspect in terms of authenticity. As several people have mentioned to me, during the Civil War Currier & Ives frequently used a grade of paper of much lower quality (as cotton linters were scarce) and that is why it is so difficult to obtain Civil War lithographs in decent condition. Printing Process:In general Currier & Ives lithographs were produced by the process of single stone lithography, but some of the more complex lithographs required 3 or more stones, generally each one for a different color. There are also a number of chromolithographs produced by the firm in the 1890’s that are often listed as “printed in oils” which were done with stones but by an outside firm as C&I was not set up to handle this more modern process. Generally, once you have seen a real C&I you will not be fooled by the run of the mill later copies. Conservation and Restoration: I am not a purist, some do not believe in restoring old lithographs, rather they believe we should leave well enough alone. I do not accept that philosophy for lithographs that have significant damage, have been improperly stored or will be destroyed over time by acidic or other conditions. So, I believe in restoration and conservation, but only to the extent necessary…………There are many lithographs that deserve full restoration and conservation services (something I am doing). The process of restoration and conservation is time consuming and costly and not all lithographs are worth the time or expense. You can infer from this description that the rarest lithographs undergoing conservation will not appear here. If you have an interest in the process I would suggest you look into the publications of the AIC (American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works). Conservators rarely discuss their techniques and discourage amateurs from trying to restore old prints. However, restoration and conservation represent chemistry and physics with a goodly dose of artistic interpretation, and a hefty dose of the proper equipment and training and so there only a few conservators to use. I use Wayne Osterholm as my conservator. Taking care of these lithographs will assure that the next generation has a chance to evaluate the history of our country through the contemporary eyes of these famous artists. I think we owe preservation of these historic documents to our children and our grandchildren. Frames: Occasionally I will sell a lithograph framed, but generally my lithographs are unframed, these are placed in a plastic sleeve for protection Upcoming Items:For the next year or two I plan to list 10+ lithographs per week so I can thin down the mass of prints stored in cabinets. Questions:I will try to answer any and all questions posed to me. Bidding:Generally, I start the lithographs off at a low price, however, there will be a select few that are not in the low-price category. Many of you do not bid until the last 10 seconds or so of an auction, so I do not end my auctions early unless there is an error in the listing that is discovered too late for people to evaluate a correction. If you notice an error just let me know and I will fix it promptly or remove the litho. Again, I want you to be satisfied with your purchase AND have enough information up front to decide if you should even bid on the lithograph. I previously sold lithographs for about 8 years on eBay in the early 2000’s with a different seller ID. Returns:You may return this lithograph if you are dissatisfied with the accuracy of my description, or if I failed to disclose pertinent information in either: the description, details, pictures or answers to queries. Returnable that is, provided it is returned in the same condition as you received it. Shipping charges are not refundable. Thanks for looking and good luck, I hope you are successful in your collecting!
